Eksplorasi Adversity Quotient dan Implikasinya Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Siswa: Studi Kasus Di Salah Satu SMA Negeri Kabupaten Karawang

Vanessa Zahwa Chakim; Rina Marlina

doi:10.31949/dm.v7i2.16246

Authors

Vanessa Zahwa Chakim Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia
Rina Marlina Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v7i2.16246

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pentingnya penguatan aspek nonkognitif dalam pendidikan, khususnya Adversity Quotient (AQ) yang berperan dalam membentuk ketangguhan dan keaktifan belajar siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan tingkat AQ siswa SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Karawang serta menganalisis implikasinya terhadap keaktifan belajar di sekolah menengah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan teknik analisis statistik deskriptif. Instrumen yang digunakan berupa angket AQ yang mengukur empat dimensi utama, yaitu Control, Ownership, Reach, dan Endurance. Data dianalisis menggunakan nilai rata-rata, simpangan baku, serta pengelompokan kategori berdasarkan skor total AQ dan klasifikasi tingkat ketangguhan siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat AQ siswa secara keseluruhan berada pada kategori sedang, dengan nilai rata-rata 157,11 dan simpangan baku 23,22. Klasifikasi lebih lanjut mengindikasikan bahwa mayoritas siswa (45 siswa) termasuk kategori Quitters, dua siswa tergolong Campers, dan tidak ditemukan siswa dalam kategori Climbers. Tingkat AQ yang sedang berkorelasi dengan keaktifan belajar yang masih bervariasi, menunjukkan perlunya strategi pembelajaran yang menumbuhkan ketangguhan akademik. Implikasinya, penguatan AQ perlu diintegrasikan dalam strategi pembelajaran melalui pendekatan reflektif, kolaboratif, dan berbasis pemecahan masalah. Penelitian lanjutan disarankan untuk mengeksplorasi hubungan antara

Keywords:

Adversity Quotient , Ketangguhan akademik, Keaktifan belajar , Siswa SMA , Pembelajaran reflektif

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfaruqy, M. Z., Sari, I. A., & Safuroh, S. (2022). Hubungan dukungan sosial orang tua dan Adversity Quotient dengan motivasi belajar pada siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Baturetno. Jurnal Kesejahteraan Keluarga dan Pendidikan, 10(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.21009/JKKP.101.04

Aljura, A. N., Retnawati, H., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2023). A meta-analysis: The effect of emotional intelligence on students’ mathematics learning outcomes in Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v11i2.71116

Amelia, M. P., Sariwulan, R. T., & Wahono, P. (2023). Peer Social Support, Adversity Quotient, and Self-Efficacy on Academic Resilience Among Vocational Schools Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Perkantoran, dan Akuntansi, 4(2), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpepa.0402.06

Andyani, A. A., & Indryawati, R. (2018). Adversity Quotient dan prestasi akademik pada siswa SMA. Jurnal Psikologi, 11(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.35760/psi.2018.v11i2.2258

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=188691

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=766980

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf

Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Research methods in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/research-methods-in-education/toc

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Hirose, M. (2019). Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000086. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000086

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research/book241842

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Faisal, E. (2024). Persistence as a mediator between motivation and performance accomplishment among medical students: A mixed method approach. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 29(5), 1549-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10315-5

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3133722

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books. https://donainfo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/emotional-intelligence-daniel-goleman.pdf

Goodfellow, L. T. (2023). An overview of survey research. Respiratory Care, 68(9), 1309-1313. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11041

Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2012). When IQ is not everything: Intelligence, personality and academic performance at school. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 518-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.024

Jannah, K. A., Syafriyanti, F., Dahlan, T. H., & Hafina, A. (2024). Students engagement analysis in Indonesia and Malaysia. Proceeding Series of Psychology, 2(1), 177-182. https://psikologi.unair.ac.id/proceeding-series-of-psychology/index.php/psp/en/article/view/-131

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Kartika Asih, F., & Hardew, A. K. (2012). The relationship of self regulated learning to student engagement in high school students. Indonesian Counseling and Psychology (Ergasia), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/icp.v5i2.65464

Lämsä, J., de Mooij, S., Aksela, O., Athavale, S., Bistolfi, I., Azevedo, R., ... & Järvelä, S. (2025). Measuring secondary education students' self-regulated learning processes with digital trace data. Learning and Individual Differences, 118, 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102625

Mertens, D. M. (2020). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-and-evaluation-in-education-and-psychology/book259508

Mudkanna Gavhane, J., & Pagare, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence for education and its emphasis on assessment and adversity quotient: a review. Education+ Training, 66(6), 609-645. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2023-0117

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/-123456789/24325/1/48.W.%20Lawrence%20Neuman.pdf

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. https://www.worldcat.org/title/psychometric-theory/oclc/28425025

oshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975

Pamungkas, A. S., & Pramudya, I. (2025). Adversity Quotient sebagai Kunci Kesuksesan Penalaran Spasial dalam Pembelajaran Geometri. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 14(3), 534-544. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v14i3.94249

Phoolka, S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A new paradigm to explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.35316/jummy.v2i1.5520

Safi'i, A., Muttaqin, I., Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa'i, M. K. (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510

Saxena, S., & Rathore, B. (2025). Adversity quotient as determining factor of mental health and professional quality of life among healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Annals of neurosciences, 32(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531241231055

Sharifian, P., Kuchaki, Z., & Shoghi, M. (2024). Effect of resilience training on stress, hope and psychological toughness of mothers living with mentally and physically disabled children. BMC pediatrics, 24(1), 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04828-6

Shengyao, Y., Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, H., Mengshi, Y., Minqin, C., Xuefen, L., & Mustafa, Z. (2024). Academic resilience, self-efficacy, and motivation: the role of parenting style. Scientific reports, 14(1), 5571. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55530-7

Shi, Y., & Qu, S. W. (2022). The effect of cognitive ability on academic achievement: The mediating role of self-discipline and the moderating role of planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1014655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014655

Stoltz, P. G. (1999). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. John Wiley & Sons. https://catalogimages.wiley.com/images/db/pdf/0471178926.pdf

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Kualitatif, dan Tindakan, 189-190. https://www.library.stiami.ac.id/index.php?p=fstream-pdf&fid=143&bid=12119

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. https://inlislite.dispusip.jakarta.go.id/opac/detail-opac?id=85963

Suryadi, B., & Santoso, T. (2017). Self‐Efficacy, Adversity Quotient, and Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n10p12

Susanti, R., & Putra, G. P. (2018). Hubungan Adversity Quotient dengan motivasi berprestasi pada siswa/i kelas XII IPS II di SMAN 8 Batam tahun 2018. Jurnal Ilmiah Zona Psikologi, 1(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.37776/jizp.v1i3.716

Tinto, V. (2025). Student persistence through a different lens. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 26(4), 959-969. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251241249158

Untari, A. D. (2022). Game based learning: alternative 21st century innovative learning models in improving student learning activeness. Edueksos Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi, 11(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/edueksos.v11i2.11919

Utsumi, Y., & Muradi, M. T. (2024). Leveraging social capital for educational resilience in conflict: The impact of community behaviors on educational access in pre-Taliban ruling Afghanistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 106, 104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104428

Yanti, F., & Nuryadi. (2017). Pengaruh adversity quotient terhadap prestasi akademik dan keaktifan belajar siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v4i1.1336

Yudiar, A., Yudha, E. S., & Sartono, S. (2024). Exploration on High School Students’ Grit: Its Effects on the Students’ Potential Development. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 6(3), 15. https://citeus.um.ac.id/jkbk/vol6/iss3/15