The Relationship Between Cambodian EFL Students’Attitudes Towards Cooperative Learning Strategies and Their Academic Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v12i2.18577Abstract
The Cambodian Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sport (MoEYS) prioritizes three key outcomes: enhanced academic achievement, positive student attitudes, and the adoption of cooperative learning as a core pedagogical approach. While previous research in developing countries has explored the field, such as often featured limited sample sizes and short durations, necessitating further research to bridge these gaps. Accordingly, this study investigates the relationship between students’ attitudes toward cooperative learning and academic achievement within the context of New Generation School (NGS) in Cambodia. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods research design was employed to address the research objectives. The convenient sample comprised 422 NGS students from grade 7 and grade 10. Additionally, three teachers and five students were purposefully selected for semi-structured interviews. Data collection instruments included the research for data were of a five-point Likert scale questionnaires and interview protocols, synthesized and developed by this researcher. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences program (henceforth, SPSS), while qualitative data were processed through content analysis. Main Findings: The findings revealed that the NGS students in both grade 7 and 10 possess highly positive attitudes toward cooperative learning, as measured by the ABC (Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive) model. These attitudes are rooted in the students’ attitudes towards cooperative learning focuses on its value and benefits. Participants particularly valued cooperative learning for its contribution to social and cognitive development, stress reduction, enjoyment, and learning performance, all of which ultimately contribute to better educational outcomes. However, they had some concerns, including time-consuming, conflicting interests, and potential grade drawbacks in terms of their final course grade. Furthermore, Grade 10 students exhibited more favorable attitudes and higher achievement scored compared to grade 7 students. Statistical analysis a significant difference between the two grade levels regarding their emotional engagement with cooperative learning (p = 0.000). Regarding perceived academic performance, the significance value was 0.011 (at the p < 0.05). Qualitative data further confirmed that teachers perceived cooperative learning as valuable instructional strategy fostering students engaged and motivated. The study recommends the broader implementation of cooperative learning frameworks in classrooms and the transforming of educational institutions into learning communities. The study revealed that cooperative learning improves social skills, cognitive growth, and stress reduction, but students are also concerned about efficiency and fairness in grading. Accordingly, this study shed light on the practical and emotional problems of cooperative learning that were generally missed in the literature. The findings would also provide a more complete knowledge of cooperative learning's adoption in education by bridging theoretical advantages and real-world student concerns.
Keywords:
Attitudes, Cooperative Learning, Academic Achievement, New Generation School (NGS) StudentsDownloads
References
A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
A. G. Greenwald, “Behavior change following a persuasive communication,” Journal of Personality, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 370–391, 1965, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01392.x.
A. S. Lamb, “Persuasion and computer-based instruction: the impact of various involvement strategies in a computer-based instruction lesson on the attitude change of college students toward the use of seat belts,” Doctor of Philosophy, Iowa State University, Digital Repository, Ames, 1987. doi: 10.31274/rtd-180813-11862.
Adl-Amini, K., Völlinger, V. A., & Eckart, A. (2023). Implementation quality of cooperative learning and teacher beliefs—a mixed methods study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 2267–2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00769-3
Burns, R. B. (1999). The self-concept in theory, measurement, development and behaviour. Longman.
Borich, G. (2007). Effective Teaching Methods 6th Ed. Pearson Education: Upper Saddle
River: NJ.
Burns, P., Roe, B., & Ross, E. (1999). Teaching reading in today’s elementary school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and E. J. Holubec, The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School. ASCD, 1994.
Downing, J. (1982). Reading–skill or cognitive process? Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4), 534–542.
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations, 2(2), 129– 152. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204
Eggen, P., Jacobsen, D., Kauchak, D. (2006) Methods for Teaching: Promoting Student
Learning in K-12 Classrooms. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
E. Baines, P. Blatchford, and P. Kutnick, “Changes in grouping practices over primary and secondary school,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 9–34, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00071-5.
Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., and Midgley,
C. (19831. Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (ed.),
Achievement and Achievement Motives, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Felder, R. M. (1994). Cooperative learning in technical courses: Procedures, pitfalls, and payoffs. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED377038.
F. Gull and S. Shehzad, “Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 9, no. 3, Art. no. 3, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.2071.
G. C. Fenneman, “The Validity of Previous Experience, Aptitude, and Attitude Toward Mathematics as Predictors of Achievement in Freshman Mathematics at Wartburg College,” PhD, University of Northern Colorado, 1973. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=7096941
G. Perry and N. Kopperman, “A Better Chance: Evaluation of Student Attitudes and Academic Performance, 1964-1972,” A Better Chance, Inc, Mar. 1973. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED075556
G. Norman, “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics,” Adv in Health Sci Educ, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 625–632, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
G. A. Ferguson and Y. Takane, Statistical Analysis In Psychology and Education, 6th Edition, 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1989.
Hang, C. N. (2021). Education reform in New Generation Schools. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.
Hulewicz, R. (2020). Third through fifth grade teachers’ perceptions and practices of cooperative learning [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University].
Jacobs, G. M., & Ivone, K. (2020). Cooperative learning for 21st-century learners. Springer
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A Meta-Analysis. Available: http://www.co-operation.org/pages-methods.html (April 20, 2007).
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1993). Cooperation in the classroom. Interaction Book Company
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th edition. Washington DC: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2018.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Assessing students in groups: Promoting student learning and individual accountability. Corwin Press
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning. Ponencia Plenaria. Inovacion Educacion. University of Minnesota. Congreso Internacional.
Kirby (2007). Conduct action research of cooperative learning in an accounting class at high school in rural Jamaica.
K. McLeish, “Attitude of Students Towards Cooperative Learning Methods at Knox Community College: A Descriptive Study,” 2009. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED506779
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.
Lampe, J. R., Rooze, G. E., & Tallent-Runnels, M. (1998). Teaching social studies with cooperative learning: Effects on students' Elizabeth achievement and attitudes. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(3), 174-181.
L. R. Antil, J. R. Jenkins, S. K. Wayne, and P. F. Vadasy, “Cooperative Learning: Prevalence, Conceptualizations, and the Relation Between Research and Practice,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 419–454, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.3102/00028312035003419.
Slavin, R. E. (2012). Cooperative Learning and Achievement: Theory and Research. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207008
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction that Works: Research-based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
McLeish (2009). Attitude of students toward cooperative learning methods at Knox Community College: A Descriptive Study. Postgraduate diploma, University of Technology, Jamaica.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS), the Kingdom of Cambodia, “New Generation School Operational Policy Guidelines.” Author, 2019.
McLeod, S. (2012), Zone of proximal development. Simply psychology.
M. Suendarti and V. Virgana, “Elevating Natural Science Learning Achievement: Cooperative Learning and Learning Interest,” Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 114–120, Feb. 2022, Accessed: Mar. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1339136
M. R. Simonson, “Attitude Change and Achievement: Dissonance Theory in Education,” The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 163–169, Jan. 1977, doi:10.1080/00220671.1977.10884976.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS), the Kingdom of Cambodia, “Cambodia Secondary Education Blueprint 2030.” Author, 2021.
Nith, Bunlay., Wayne E., Wright., Hor, Sophea., Krut, Bredenburg. (2010). Active-learning pedagogies as a reform initiative: The case of Cambodia. USAID from the American people
N. Each and S. Suppasetseree, “The Effects of Mobile-Blended Cooperative Learning on EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension in Cambodian Context,” LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 143–170, 2021, Accessed: May 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1310712
Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognition theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html
P. T. H. Thanh, R. Gillies, and P. Renshaw, “Cooperative Learning (CL) and Academic Achievement of Asian Students: A True Story,” International Education Studies, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 82–88, Aug. 2008, Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1065440
R. J. Stahl, “The Essential Elements of Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. ERIC Digest,” Mar. 1994. Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED370881
Ransdell, M and Moberly, D. (2003). A Journey into Cooperative Learning with Teacher Education Students. Retrieved December 3, 2007 from http://www.usca.edu/essays/vol62003/ransdall.pdf.
R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and N. Miller, Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
S. Tang and P. Ruannakarn, “Implementation of Cooperative Learning Method to Enhance the Students’ Learning Ability and Students’ Core Competencies,” Higher Education Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 104–115, 2024, Accessed: Mar. 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1440062
S. Chan, Maneewan ,Sorakrich, and R. and Koul, “Cooperative learning in teacher education: its effects on EFL pre-service teachers’ content knowledge and teaching self-efficacy,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654–667, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2021.1931060.
Saborit, J. A. P., Fernández-Río, J., Estrada, J. A. C., Méndez-Giménez, A., & Alonso, D. M. (2016). Teachers’ attitude and perception toward cooperative learning implementation: Influence of continuing training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 438–445
Thomas, W.I. & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America Boston, MA: Badger.
Tang, H. (2000). Using cooperative concept mapping skill to teach ESL reading. PASAA, 30, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.pasaa.30.1.8
T. H. Ollendick and C. S. Schroeder, Encyclopedia of Clinical Child and Pediatric Psychology. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
UNESCO (2010). Contribution of UNESCO to Compilation of UN information (to Part I. A. and
to Part III F, J, K, and P.) Retrieved from
https:/ /uprdoc.ohchr.org/uprweb/ downloadfile.aspx?filename=507&file=EnglishTranslation
W. Jolliffe, “Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: Putting it into Practice,” pp. 1–144, 2007, Accessed: Mar. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4913414
Wink, J. (2000). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Young, L. E., & Maxwell, B. (2007). Student-centered teaching in nursing: From rote to active teaching. In L. Young & B. Paterson (Eds.), Teaching nursing: Developing a student-centered learning environment (pp. 3–25). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[63] Y. Lou, P. C. Abrami, J. C. Spence, C. Poulsen, B. Chambers, and S. d’Apollonia, “Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 423–458, Dec. 1996, doi: 10.3102/00346543066004423.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hanrith Nou, Sarom Mok, Sothea Lim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work
