Exploring Students’ Creative Thinking in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Descriptive Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v7i2.15512Abstract
This study explores students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics through a descriptive qualitative approach. The purpose of the research is to examine how students construct and express original ideas when solving open-ended mathematical problems. Participants were selected purposively based on their prior experience with similar tasks, and data were obtained from students’ written responses to problem-solving activities designed to promote divergent thinking. These tasks emphasized multiple solution strategies, reasoning justification, and reflection on originality. The data were analyzed thematically using NVivo 14, focusing on creativity indicators such as fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The findings indicate that some students were able to demonstrate creative approaches in generating diverse and original solutions, while others experienced difficulties due to limited conceptual understanding and time constraints. These results underscore the need for instructional practices that strengthen prerequisite knowledge, offer varied task designs, and allocate sufficient time to enhance students’ mathematical creativity. Overall, the study contributes to the development of pedagogical strategies that foster creative problem-solving in mathematics classrooms.
Keywords:
Creative thinking , Mathematics education , Problem solving , Student creativityDownloads
References
Abdolhossini, A. (2012). The effects of cognitive and meta-cognitive methods of teaching in mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5894–5899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.535
Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem-solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7
Arum, R. P., Widjajanti, D. B., & Retnawati, H. (2019, October). Metacognitive awareness: How it affects mathematical problem-solving process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012054
Aziz, T. A., & Kharis, S. A. A. (2021, May). Characteristics of problems for developing higher-order thinking skills in mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012074. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012074
Bayarcal, G. C., & Tan, D. A. (2023). Students’ achievement and problem-solving skills in mathematics through open-ended approach. American Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-11-4-2
Bullard, A. J., & Bahar, A. K. (2023). Common barriers in teaching for creativity in K-12 classrooms: A literature review. Journal of Creativity, 33(1), 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100045
Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM, 39(5), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0042-3
Cetin, O. F. (2015). Students perceptions and development of conceptual understanding regarding trigonometry and trigonometric function. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(3), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2017
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
David, C. V. (2012). Working memory deficits in math learning difficulties: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 58(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387711Y.0000000007
Dewi, I. L. K., & Waluya, S. B. (2021, June). Conceptual understanding and productive disposition in trigonometry through generative learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042050
Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297–323). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47676-2
Fulinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver is unsuccessful in his or her own way: Affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9134-4
Fülöp, E. (2015). Teaching problem-solving strategies in mathematics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.v3i1.1050
García, T., Boom, J., Kroesbergen, E. H., Núñez, J. C., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Planning, execution, and revision in mathematics problem solving: Does the order of the phases matter? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.03.001
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2013). Advanced mathematical-thinking at any age: Its nature and its development. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking (pp. 27–50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045955-3
Herman, T. (2018). Analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1), 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012036
Iskandar, R. S. F., & Juandi, D. (2022). Study literature review: Realistic mathematics education learning on students’ mathematical creative thinking ability. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 6(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v6i1.5739
Karasel, N., Ayda, O., & Tezer, M. (2010). The relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematical problem solving skills among primary school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5804–5807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.946
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 161–168. https://www.academia.edu/download/46350517/ED499416.pdf#page=167
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Luria, S. R., Sriraman, B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Enhancing equity in the classroom by teaching for mathematical creativity. ZDM, 49(7), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0892-2
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mourtos, N. J. (2010). Challenges students face when solving open-ended problems. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 846. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=aero_eng_pub
Permata, I. D., Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2021). Analisis Kesesuian antara LKPD dengan Model Pembelajaran. NATURALISTIC: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 764–773. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v5i2.1043
Politis, J., & Houtz, J. C. (2015). Effects of positive mood on generative and evaluative thinking in creative problem solving. SAGE Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015592679
Pratiwi, G. D., Supandi, S., & Harun, L. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar Kategori Tinggi. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v3i1.7184
Proulx, J. (2019). Mental mathematics under the lens: Strategies, oral mathematics, enactments of meanings. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100725
Purba, E. P., Sinaga, B., Mukhtar, M., & Surya, E. (2017, October). Analysis of the difficulties of the mathematical creative thinking process in the application of problem based learning model. In 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2017) (pp. 266–269). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-17.2017.55
Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Fields Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40928-018-0009-y
Schmitz, B., & Perels, F. (2011). Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized diaries. Metacognition and Learning, 6(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9076-6
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Pólya, problem solving, and education. Mathematics Magazine, 60(5), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1987.11977325
Sharma, S. (2013). Qualitative approaches in mathematics education research: Challenges and possible solutions. Education Journal, 2(2), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20130202.14
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 29(3), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
Silver, E. A. (2013). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem-solving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 33–60). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062685-2
Sitorus, E. N., Sinaga, B., & Dewi, I. (2019, December). Analysis of the difficulties of the mathematical creative thinking process in problem based learning. In 4th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2019) (pp. 467–473). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125928342
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Supandi, S., Suyitno, H., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Dwijanto, D. (2021, June). Learning barriers and student creativity in solving math problems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042088. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042088
Susilawati, S., Pujiastuti, H., & Sukirwan, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis ditinjau dari self-concept matematis siswa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.244
Švecová, V., Rumanova, L., & Pavlovičová, G. (2014). Support of pupil's creative thinking in mathematical education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1715–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.461
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2012). Collaborative problem-based learning in mathematics: A cognitive load perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.051
Treffinger, D. J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213375
Westwood, P. (2011). The problem with problems: Potential difficulties in implementing problem-based learning as the core method in primary school mathematics. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2011.563475
Yulianto, A., & Wijaya, A. P. (2022). Pelatihan software NVivo untuk menunjang penelitian kualitatif bagi mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Semarang. Jurnal Pengabdian Pendidikan Masyarakat (JPPM), 3(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.52060/jppm.v3i1.732
Zhang, J., Xie, H., & Li, H. (2019). Improvement of students’ problem-solving skills through project execution planning in civil engineering and construction management education. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(7), 1437–1454. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2018-0321
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Didactical Mathematics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
