Anticipation Guides with GenAI to Improve Text Understanding and Math Literacy in PGSD Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v8i3.15283Abstract
The ability to comprehend texts and mathematical literacy are crucial competencies for future elementary school teachers. However, research shows that students in the Elementary School Teacher Education (PGSD) program often struggle with interpreting texts and solving mathematical problems, indicating low levels of disciplinary literacy. This study aims to examine the implementation and effectiveness of the Anticipation Guides reading strategy integrated with Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in improving students’ text comprehension and mathematical literacy. A quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group was used, involving 50 PGSD students divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received instruction using Anticipation Guides integrated with GenAI, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected through pretest and posttest instruments measuring both competencies and analyzed using Independent Sample t-tests and MANOVA. The results showed that the experimental group achieved significantly higher N-gain scores in text comprehension (0.65) and mathematical literacy (0.60) compared to the control group. The statistical analysis indicated a significant effect (p < 0.001) with large effect sizes and a multivariate impact based on Wilks' Lambda (Λ = 0.291, F(2,46) = 55.93). These findings suggest that integrating Anticipation Guides with GenAI provides effective scaffolding and fosters higher-order thinking skills. The strategy enhances student engagement, supports personalized learning, and strengthens cross-disciplinary literacy. Therefore, this approach offers a relevant and innovative solution for improving essential literacies among teacher education students in the digital era.
Keywords: Anticipation Guides; Generative AI; text comprehension; mathematical literacy; PGSD students
Keywords:
Anticipation Guides; , Generative AI; , ext comprehension, mathematical literac, PGSD studentsDownloads
References
Afriyanti, A. A. A., Julia, J., & Syahid, A. A. (2023). Perbandingan Efektifitas Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Audio Visual dan Teks Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Isi Dongeng Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(4), 1719–1729.
Alani, N. (2024). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Problem Posing terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 16(1), 50–63.
Arar, K. H., Özen, H., Polat, G., & Turan, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence and research integrity: a hybrid systemic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), 44.
Borge, M., Smith, B. K., & Aldemir, T. (2024). Using generative ai as a simulation to support higher-order thinking. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 19(4), 479–532.
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., Luke, A., Luke, C., Michaels, S., & Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Cheng, Y.-P., Pedaste, M., Bardone, E., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Innovative Technologies and Learning. Springer.
Cordero, J., Torres-Zambrano, J., & Cordero-Castillo, A. (2024). Integration of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Best practices. Education Sciences, 15(1), 32.
Council, N. R. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century (J. W. Pellegrino & M. L. Hilton (eds.)). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
Daniels, H. (1996). An introduction to Vygotsky. Routledge London.
Defrioka, A. (2018). Anticipation guide: a strategy of teaching reading comprehension. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 6(2), 79.
Duffelmeyer, F. A. (1994). Effective anticipation guide statements for learning from expository prose. Journal of Reading, 452–457.
Duffelmeyer, F. A., & Baum, D. D. (1992). The extended anticipation guide revisited. Journal of Reading, 35(8), 654–656.
Firmansyah, F., Siregar, N. N., Purwati, P., & Haryanto, H. (2023). Efektifitas model problem based learning berbantuan lembar kerja siswa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi numerasi ditinjau dari rasa ingin tahu siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(2), 825–836.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Jablonka, E. (2011). Mathematical literacy. In Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75–102). Springer.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Kulju, P., Kupiainen, R., Wiseman, A. M., Jyrkiäinen, A., Koskinen-Sinisalo, K.-L., & Mäkinen, M. (2018). A review of multiliteracies pedagogy in primary classrooms. Language and Literacy, 20(2), 80–101.
Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100174.
Lee, C. C., & Low, M. Y. H. (2024). Using genAI in education: The case for critical thinking. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1452131.
Lewis-Spector, J. (2016). Building strong futures: Literacy practices for developing engaged citizenship in the 21st century. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(1), 86–95.
Li, C. S., & Wan, R. (2022). Critical reading in higher education: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101028.
Matto, G., Ponera, J. M., & Kyumana, V. (2025). GenAI and effective reading among university students: Prospects, challenges, and future directions.
McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (2002). Teaching through text: Reading and writing in the content areas. Allyn & Bacon.
Murni, S., Ruqoyyah, S., & Rabbani, S. (2021). Development of Teaching Materials Usingrealistic Mathematics Education Approaches in Improving the Capacity of Mathematic Communication of Pgsd Students. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(1), 457.
Nuranggraeni, F., & Alani, N. (2025). Transformasi Pembelajaran dengan Deep Learning: Studi Literatur Terhadap Inovasi Pembelajaran Masa Kini. Bale Aksara, 6(1), 16–22.
PISA, O. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
Presnell, K. (2022). Investigating A State-Funded Disciplinary Literacy Program In Kentucky For Educators Of Adolescent Students. Eastern Kentucky University.
Robinson, R. D. (2013). Teaching through Text: Reading and Writing in the Content Areas. Pearson Higher Ed.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7–18.
Suryaningrat, E. F., Muslihah, N. N., & Tiawati, L. (2021). Analisis Metode Jari Magic (Jarimatika) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berhitung Perkalian dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Caxra: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 29–41.
Trimurtini, Waluya, B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Kharisudin, I., Rochmad, Susilo, B. E., & Nugraheni, N. (2023). The analysis of mathematical literacy in terms of geometric thinking of PGSD students. THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION 2021, 2614(1), 40099.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
