Karakteristik Psikometrik Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Akademik (TKA) Matematika Materi Pecahan untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Rosalia Annisa Putri Universitas Jember, Indonesia
  • Tri Astari Universitas Jember, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/ijie.v4i2.19827

Abstract

The quality of mathematics assessment depends not only on content coverage but also on how well each item functions empirically. This study aimed to analyze the psychometric characteristics of a fraction-based Mathematics Academic Competency Test (Tes Kemampuan Akademik/TKA) instrument for primary school students through empirical validity, reliability, item difficulty, and discrimination power. A quantitative descriptive item-analysis design was employed using responses from 27 sixth-grade students at SD Negeri Kaliboto Lor 07, Lumajang. The trial instrument consisted of 15 dichotomously scored items in multiple-choice and complex multiple-choice formats. Empirical validity was analyzed using Pearson item-total correlations with a critical value of r = 0.381 at α = .05. Reliability was estimated using KR-20, while item difficulty and discrimination were analyzed within classical test theory. Ten of the 15 items met the empirical validity criterion, whereas five were eliminated. The KR-20 coefficient was 0.70. Among the retained items, seven were moderately difficult, two difficult, and one easy; four showed good discrimination and six showed fair discrimination. The findings indicate adequate preliminary psychometric quality, although broader validation with larger, multisite samples is still required before wider use.

Keywords:

Discrimination Power, Empirical Validity, Item Analysis, Item Difficulty, Reliability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Educational Research Association, A. P. A. & N. C. on M. in E. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Wardhani, D. A. P., Oktiningrum, W., Wibowo, A., Muslihasari, A., & Nurfianti, S. (2024). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi numerasi berdasarkan Newman’s Analysis Error serta upaya pemberian scaffolding pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri 1 Wonosari. Primary Education Journals (Jurnal Ke-SD-An), 4(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.36636/primed.v4i1.4175

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Coppi, M., Fialho, I., & Cid, M. (2023). Scientific literacy assessment instruments: A systematic literature review. Educação Em Revista, 39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698237523-t

Darman, D. R., Suhandi, A., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., & Wibowo, F. C. (2024). Development and Validation of Scientific Inquiry Literacy Instrument (SILI) Using Rasch Measurement Model. Education Sciences, 14(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030322

DeCarlo, L. T. (2023). Classical Item Analysis from a Signal Detection Perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 60(3), 520–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12358

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.

Gorham, A. , & R. (2022). Classical test theory. Routledge.

Ikhsanudin, I., Novaliah, N., Hidayatullah, H., & Almizi, M. (2023). A practical using of the QUEST program to analyze the characteristics of the test items in educational measurement. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 9(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v9i1.31163

Jafar, L., Riyadi, & Ridwan, A. (2024). Penggunaan teori tes klasik untuk analisis butir soal pada asesmen. IJSH: Indonesian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(3), 1–10. https://jurnal.academiacenter.org/index.php/IJSH

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2025 tentang Tes Kemampuan Akademik. Https://Peraturan.Bpk.Go.Id/Details/321171/Permendikdasmen-No-9-Tahun-2025.

Labibah, N., Damayani, A. T., & Sary, R. M. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Teori Newman dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Materi Pecahan Kelas V Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v4i2.33265

Meirina, E. N., Riswari, L. A., & Kironoratri, L. (2024). Analisis kesalahan siswa kelas VI SD 3 Jekulo dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita materi pecahan. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 10(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v10i1.5382

Mufit, F., & Syamsidar, S. (2022). Development of Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Instrument to Identify Students’ Concept Understanding of Newton’s Law Material. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v7i2.2369

Mustofa, R., Anif, S., & Muhibbin, M. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3492–3502. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2635

Nailia, V., Setiawan, D., & Purbasari, I. (2023). Studi Analisis Kesulitan Penyelesaian Soal Cerita pada Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 2595–2602. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i4.1878

Ningrum, A. S. B., & Sudarwati, E. (2022). Is the test sensible? Developing a critical reading test for Indonesian EFL learners. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 9(1), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v9i1.4005

Nisa, C. (2022). Analisis Karakteristik Butir Soal Tes Ujian Kenaikan Kelas Pelajaran Matematika dengan Program Iteman. YASIN, 2(6), 862–870. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v2i6.1020

Nisfatulsanah, A., & Sugiharto, B. (2024). Comparing classical test theory and item response theory for respiratory system question instruments. PIONIR: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, 13(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v13i3.25435

Nurhasanah, Astari, T., Cahyanita, E., & Nuriman. (2025). Psychometric properties of a local wisdom-based science literacy instrument for Primary School Students: An Item Response Theory approach. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(11), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i11.12973

Nurhasanah, Hidayatullah, Z., & Arif, Moh. B. S. (2024). Karakteristik instrumen tes literasi digital ditinjau dari validitas isi dan validitas empiris (kecocokan butir dengan model, reliabilitas, serta tingkat kesukaran butir). Journal of Classroom Action Research, 6(4), 916–923. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v6i4.9650

Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan. (2025). Kerangka Asesmen Tes Kemampuan Akademik Jenjang SD/MI/Sederajat. https://pusmendik.kemendikdasmen.go.id/tka/tka/view/mata-pelajaran-wajib/sd/matematika

Ramatu, N., & Kongnyuy, P. (2025). An Analysis of Item Difficulty and Item Discrimination of Mathematics Multiple Choice Items (2023 and 2024) in Bamboutos Division of Cameroon. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(3), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.3.3600

Rezigalla, A. A., Eleragi, A. M. E. S. A., Elhussein, A. B., Alfaifi, J., ALGhamdi, M. A., Al Ameer, A. Y., Yahia, A. I. O., Mohammed, O. A., & Adam, M. I. E. (2024). Item analysis: the impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 445. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05433-y

Riyadi, A., Susongko, P., & Munadi, M. (2024). Model asesmen literasi sains pada peserta didik Sekolah Dasar dengan aplikasi Model Rasch. Journal of Education Research, 5(3), 3044–3054. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i3.1411

Rohmah, M., Hilyana, F. S., & Ermawati, D. (2024). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas V Materi Pecahan. Al-Madrasah Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 8(2), 708. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v8i2.3425

Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Waty, E. R. K., Nengsih, Y. K., Handrianto, C., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). The quality of teacher-made summative tests for Islamic education subject teachers in Palembang, Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(1), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.53558

Downloads

Abstract Views : 36
Downloads Count: 23

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Annisa Putri, R., & Astari, T. (2026). Karakteristik Psikometrik Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Akademik (TKA) Matematika Materi Pecahan untuk Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education, 4(2), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijie.v4i2.19827