Development of Student Worksheets with the Help of Worked Examples on Matrix Material in Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v11i2.17620Abstract
Mathematics is an important branch of science to learn in order to solve problems and present problems from contextual situations or conditions. This research includes research and development using the ADDIE model approach. This research produced a learning product in the form of worked examples that are suitable for use in mathematics learning on matrix material. The steps taken in this development were analysis, design, and development. The needs analysis was conducted by analyzing the matrix material found in phase E at the vocational high school/vocational high school level. The learning outcomes used were performing addition and subtraction operations on matrix forms. The design of the worksheet with the worked example approach included a template consisting of objectives, strategies, and concise material to help students learn matrices. In addition, providing story questions and clear steps for solving them can make it easier for students to understand the concept of matrices. Development is the final stage in research and development, which includes product design, feasibility testing, and product testing. The conclusion that can be drawn at this stage is that the learning product in the form of worked examples produces a product category that is suitable for use. The results from the validators, who are media experts and subject matter experts, show that the product is suitable for use without revision. The validators consisted of two education practitioners, designated as validator 1 and validator 2. The score obtained from validator 1 was 43 and validator 2 was 45, with an average of 44. Both validators produced a percentage of 88%, which is classified as good and requires no revision.
Keywords:
Development, Worked Examples, Matrix, Senior High SchoolDownloads
References
Ari Setiyani, Yudi Kustiana, Sri Wantini, Setiawan Agung Wibowo, Kiki Ariyanti Sugeng, & Dicky Susanto. (2025). Panduan mata pelajaran matematika fase a - f dan fase f tingkat lanjut. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia.
Ashcraft, Mark H., & Krause, Justin A. (2019). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety: A review of recent findings. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.10.004 .
Borg, Walter R., & Gall, Meredith D. (2018). Educational research: An introduction (10th ed.). Pearson.
Chambers, P. (2017). Teaching mathematics: Developing as a reflective secondary teacher (2nd ed.). Sage.
Clark, Richard C., Nguyen, Fred, & Sweller, John. (2016). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Deci, Edward L., & Ryan, Richard M. (2017). Self-determination theory: 35 years of progress and future directions. In Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 18, pp. 127–166). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-336320170000018008
Gagné, Robert M., Wager, Walter W., Golas, Kathryn C., & Keller, John M. (2019). Principles of instructional design (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hagan, L. M. (2020). The role of aesthetic learning in fostering mathematical creativity and engagement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09924-5.
Sari, I. P., & Prasetyo, E. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar matematika berbasis model ADDIE pada materi operasi hitung bilangan bulat. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1234/jpm.v14i1.2020
Schön, Donald A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.
Irwansyah, M. F., & Retnowati, E. (2019). Efektivitas worked examples dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 62–74.
Kurniawati, W. (2021). Desain perencanaan pembelajaran. Jurnal An-Nur: Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 7(01), 1–10.
Lubis, R. A., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Development of mathematics student worksheets based on mathematical understanding with a worked example approach. EduMatika: Jurnal MIPA, 2(3), 69–74.
NCTM. (2018). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nuraeni, Z., Simarmata, R. H., & Tarigan, A. H. Z. (2023). Implementation worked example-based learning to improve junior high school students’mathematical representation ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 6(1), 36–41.
Oroh, V., Manurung, O., & Tumalun, N. K. (2023). Analisis kesalahan peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika materi operasi matriks. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(2), 732–741.
Putra, F. P., & Toni, T. (2024). Analysis of the Algebraic Reasoning Ability of State Madrasah Tsanawiyah Students in Solving Mathematical Problems based on Cognitive Style. JTMT: Journal Tadris Matematika, 5(2), 128-137.
Renkl, Andreas, Atkinson, Richard K., Maier, Udo H., & Staley, Richard. (2017). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 749–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9397-0.
Retnowati, E., & Fadlila, N. (2023). The compound area of quadrilaterals and triangles: a worked example based learning design. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7 (1), 150.
Rittle-Johnson, Bethany, & Schneider, Markus. (2020). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: A systematic review of research. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 829-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09500-w.
Sholikhah, S., & Fahmi, S. (2022). Desain pembelajaran worked example pada materi trigonometri. Seminar Nasional Hasil Pelaksanaan Program Pengenalan Lapangan Persekolahan, 1471–1480.
Slavin, Robert E. (2024). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (14th ed.). Pearson.
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16.
Sweller, John, Ayres, Paul, & Kalyuga, Slava. (2019). Cognitive load theory (2nd ed.). Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Firnanda Pradana Putra, Ahmad Maulana Syafi'i, Anisa Dwiyana, Putri Patricia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
