Analysis of students’ computational thinking in solving numerical methods problem using microsoft excel

Authors

  • Resty Yuliana Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Melinda Yanuar Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Nur Hidayanti Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Huswatun Hasanah Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v11i1.16953

Abstract

Computational thinking is an essential skill in the digital age, particularly in Numerical Methods courses that require logical, algorithmic, and technology-based problem solving. However, students often find it difficult to acquire algorithmic thinking and abstraction while using computational tools to apply numerical techniques. This study aims to assess the computational thinking abilities of Universitas Banten Jaya students by examining their algorithmic and abstraction indicators during Numerical Methods exercises in Microsoft Excel. This study, which employed a descriptive quantitative–qualitative methodology, involved 62 students who were enrolled in the Numerical Methods course during the Odd Semester of the 2025–2026 academic year. Data for the midterm exam was collected via students' responses to computational essays that involved the development of algorithms, their application in Microsoft Excel, and the analysis of their results. Qualitative data was evaluated using content analysis, and quantitative data was evaluated using descriptive statistics. The results showed a medium level of computational thinking skill with an average score of 66.29. The achievement scores for the algorithmic and abstraction measures are 67.34% and 67.74%, respectively. These findings suggest that more structured and digitally integrated training is needed to improve students' computational thinking skills.

Keywords:

Computational thinking; Numerical methods; Algorithmic thinking; Abstraction; Microsoft Excel

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Resty Yuliana, Universitas Bina Bangsa

Statistika Universitas Bina Bangsa

Melinda Yanuar, Universitas Bina Bangsa

Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Bina Bangsa

Nur Hidayanti, Universitas Bina Bangsa

Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi Universitas Bina Bangsa

Huswatun Hasanah, Universitas Bina Bangsa

Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Bina Bangsa

References

Azizah, N., Suryadi, D., & Herman, T. (2022). Computational thinking in solving sequence and series problems. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 145–158.

Baker, J., & Sugden, S. (2003). Spreadsheets in Education The First 25 Years. Spreadsheets in Education, 1(1), 18–43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27827008_Spreadsheets_in_Education_-The_First_25_Years%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephen-Sugden/publication/27827008_Spreadsheets_in_Education_-The_First_25_Years/links/00b7d519519ac05257000000/Spreads

Barendsen, E., Mannila, L., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Izu, C., Mirolo, C., Sentance, S., Settle, A., & Stupuriene, G. (2015). Concepts in K-9 computer science education. In ITiCSE-WGP 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858800

Basu, S., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2014). Assessing student performance in a computational-thinking based science learning environment. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8474 LNCS, 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_59

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education [Desarrollando el pensamiento computacional en la Educación obligatoria]. https://doi.org/10.2791/792158

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).

Büscher, C. (2025a). Assessing algorithmic and abstraction dimensions of computational thinking. Computers & Education, 195, 104722.

Büscher, C. (2025b). Differences in Students’ Computational Thinking Activities when Designing an Algorithm for Drawing Plane Figures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10465-3

Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998438

El-Hamamsy, L., & others. (2025). Designing valid assessment tasks for computational thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 89–110.

Fatma Dewi Mardianto, N., William Iskandar Muda Ps, J. V, Estate, M., Percut Sei Tuan, K., & Deli Serdang, K. (2024). Systematic Literature Review: Penerapan Berpikir Komputasi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Yahfizham Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara. Journal of Student Research (JSR), 2(4), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v2i4.3082

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.

Guggemos, J., Seufert, S., & Sailer, M. (2024). Measuring computational thinking: Challenges and perspectives. Computers & Education, 196, 104726.

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2017.01.005

Lockwood, E., Asay, A., DeJarnette, A. F., & Thomas, M. (2016). Algorithmic thinking: An initial characterization of computational thinking in mathematics. 38th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1588–1595.

Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.09.012

Lyon, J. A., Magana, A. J., & Vieira, C. (2022). Abstraction and pattern generalization in computational problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(2), 356–378.

Maharani, S., Pramudya, I., & Kuswardi, Y. (2023). Abstraction skills in computational thinking-based mathematics learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 97–112.

Mirolo, C., Izu, C., Lonati, V., & Scapin, E. (2021). Abstraction in Computer Science Education: An Overview. Informatics in Education, 20(4), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2021.27

Nainggolan, R., Sihotang, H., & Simarmata, J. (2024). Classification of students’ problem-solving abilities using descriptive statistics. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 21–34.

Penelitian, J. H., Kepustakaan, K., & Pendidikan, B. (2024). Jurnal Kependidikan: 10(2), 640–653.

Permatasari, D. (2024). Interpretation of computational thinking indicator achievement levels. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 66–78.

Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.08.047

Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: The developing definition. ITiCSE Conference Proceedings, 5–8.

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158.

Taufik, M., & Susanti, R. D. (2024). Solving numerical method problems with mathematical software: Identifying computational thinking. Pedagogical Research, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14583

Villamin, A., Cruz, J. P., & Santos, R. (2025). Qualitative descriptive research in education. International Journal of Educational Research, 121, 102115.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.

Downloads

Abstract Views : 80
Downloads Count: 42

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Yuliana, R., Yanuar, M., Hidayanti, N., & Hasanah, H. (2026). Analysis of students’ computational thinking in solving numerical methods problem using microsoft excel. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 11(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v11i1.16953