Strategies Used by Engineering Graphics and Design Teachers to Support Progressed Learners in Bridging Content Gaps

Teachers’ Perspectives on Foundational Knowledge Gaps and Learner Support

Authors

  • Siphesihle Eugene Mthethwa 3Durban University of Technology, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
  • Mogale Simon Albert Maeko University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa
  • Douglas Thembinkosi Sotsaka Durban University of Technology, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v12i2.18239

Abstract

This study explored the strategies used by Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) teachers to support progressed learners in bridging content knowledge gaps. The study was motivated by the persistent underperformance of progressed learners in EGD, particularly in tasks requiring spatial visualisation and the application of foundational drawing principles. The study aimed to examine teachers’ perceptions of these content knowledge gaps and identify the strategies used to address them. A qualitative research approach within the interpretivist paradigm was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight EGD teachers from seven secondary schools and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis approach. The findings revealed that progressed learners experience challenges related to spatial visualisation, orthographic projection, isometric drawing, assembly drawing, and analytical tasks. Teachers attributed these challenges to weak foundational knowledge acquired during Grade 9 Technology, poor retention of concepts, and difficulties in applying drawing conventions consistently. The findings further showed that inadequate foundational knowledge negatively affects learners’ ability to cope with advanced EGD concepts in the Further Education and Training phase. The study concludes that strengthened foundational instruction, targeted learner support, and effective intervention strategies are essential for improving learner performance in EGD.

Keywords:

Engineering Graphics and Design, progressed learners, content knowledge gaps, spatial visualisation, teacher strategies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chery, K. (2019). What is attachment theory? The importance of early emotional bonds. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-attachment-theory-2795337

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.

Department of Basic Education. (2011). National Curriculum Statement Grades R–12: Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) introduction and overview. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

Department of Basic Education. 2012. Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS): Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) Grades 10–12. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

Department of Basic Education. (2015). National policy pertaining to the programme and promotion requirements of the National Curriculum Statement Grades R–12. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

Department of Basic Education. (2023). National Senior Certificate diagnostic report. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

Department of Basic Education. (2024). Annual report 2023/2024. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (2013). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Khobe, M.A., & Mukuna, K.R. (2023). The Effects of School Progression Policy on the Progressed Grade 12 Learners’ Well-Being At Schools – A Case Study of the Motheo Education District, South Africa. E-Journal of Humanities Arts and Social Sciences, 4(10), 1243-1252. DOI:10.38159/ehass.20234107

Khoza, S., & Makgato, M. (2016). Difficulties of student teachers in the Engineering Graphics and Design course at a South African university: Snapshot on sectional drawing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1227a

Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Paradigms in educational research. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 193-205. https://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html

Li, Z., & Bergin, C. (2022). Positive teacher-student relationships may lead to better teaching. Learning and Instruction, 80(6045):10158. DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101581

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2019). Attachment Orientations and Emotion Regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.006.

Mogale, M., & Modipane, M. (2021). The implementation of the progression policy in secondary schools of the Limpopo province in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 41(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n1a1853

Mhlungu, V., & Mlambo, C. (2025). An investigation into the teaching challenges encountered in the grade 10 engineering graphics and design classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, 12(2), 145-152. RePEc:aoj:jeelre:v:12:y:2025:i:2:p:145-152:id:6745

Naicker, P., Mthembu, T., Govender, R., and Pillay, S. (2025). 'Peer-assisted learning in Engineering Graphics and Design: A cost-effective intervention',.Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.103583.

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Opoku, A., Ahmed, V., & Akotia, J. (2016). Choosing an appropriate research methodology and method. In V. Ahmed, A. Opoku, & Z. Aziz (Eds.), Research methodology in the built environment: A selection of case studies (pp. 32–49). Routledge.

Rathore, M., & Gadge, L. (2024). Study of the Difficulties and Challenges Faced by Engineering Students in Engineering Drawing. Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(xii), DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.65934

Rautanen, P., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2026). Primary school students’ perceived teacher support – associations with teachers’ resources and contextual factors. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 70(1), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2468174

Singh-Pillay, A., & Sotsaka, D. (2021). Scaffolding preservice engineering graphics and design teachers’ interpretation ability of assembly drawing. Nigerian Journal of Technology. 40(6). doi:10.4314/njt.v40i6.1

Sotsaka, D., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2020). Meeting the challenges first year engineering graphic design pre-service teachers encounter when they read and interpret assembly drawing. Journal of Education ,80. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i80a04

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications ,6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Abstract Views : 53
Downloads Count: 7

Published

2026-06-20

How to Cite

Siphesihle Eugene Mthethwa, Maeko, M. S. A., & Douglas Thembinkosi Sotsaka. (2026). Strategies Used by Engineering Graphics and Design Teachers to Support Progressed Learners in Bridging Content Gaps: Teachers’ Perspectives on Foundational Knowledge Gaps and Learner Support. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 12(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v12i2.18239

Issue

Section

Articles