Students’ Perceptions Toward The Use of ChatGPT in Improving Writing Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v12i2.18194Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has significantly influenced language learning, particularly in writing instruction. One of the most widely used AI tools is ChatGPT, which offers various features that can support students in developing their writing skills. This study aimed to explore students’ perceptions toward the use of ChatGPT in improving writing skills. The study employed a mixed-method sequential explanatory design. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 30 second-semester students of the English Education Study Program at UMNU Kebumen, while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with five selected participants. The findings revealed that students generally had positive perceptions toward the use of ChatGPT. Among the four indicators, Perceived Usefulness obtained the highest mean score (3.94), followed by Perceived Benefits (3.78) and Perceived Ease of Use (3.63). Meanwhile, Concerns and Anxieties showed a moderate level (3.42), indicating that students still had concerns regarding dependency, plagiarism, and information accuracy. The qualitative findings further showed that students viewed ChatGPT as a helpful tool for generating ideas, improving grammar, enriching vocabulary, and increasing writing confidence. However, students also emphasized the importance of using ChatGPT critically and responsibly. Overall, this study concludes that ChatGPT has strong potential to support EFL students’ writing development when used appropriately as a supporting learning tool.
Keywords:
ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, EFL learning, Student Perceptions, writing skillsDownloads
References
Chairiah, A. M., Edi, W., & Yana, D. (2025). University students’ perception of using ChatGPT toward their writing skills. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 12(2), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v12i2.42797
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lubis, N. K., Azhar, F., & Daud, A. (2025). Students’ perception towards ChatGPT for academic writing at English Study Program FKIP Universitas Riau. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.5887
Mardiansyah & Setiani, R. (2025). Investigating Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT's Role in Supporting Writing Skills. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7886
Salwa, A., & Tyas, N. K. (2024). Exploring students’ perception of EFL on the use of ChatGPT to complete the English writing task. Berumpun: International Journal of Social, Politics, and Humanities, 7(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.33019/berumpun.v7i1.186
Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
Mohamed, M. S. P. (2024). Exploring ethical dimensions of AI-enhanced language education: A literature perspective. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1813
Selvam, M., & Vallejo, R. G. (2025). Ethical and Privacy Considerations in AI-Driven Language Learning. LatIA. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia2025328
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
Shen, M., Shen, Y., Liu, F., & Jin, J.-W. (2025). Prompts, privacy, and personalized learning: integrating AI into nursing education—a qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03115-8
Sirnoorkar, A., & Rebello, N. (2025). Feedback That Clicks: Introductory Physics Students'Valued Features in AI Feedback Generated From Self-Crafted and Engineered Prompts.
Zamorano, C. (2025). Enhancing academic writing in English language education through generative AI integration. Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v3i3.87
Utami, S., Andayani, A., Winarni, R., & Sumarwati, S. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265 - 1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Kim, J., Yu, S., Lee, S.-S., & Detrick, R. (2025). Students’ prompt patterns and its effects in AI-assisted academic writing: Focusing on students’ level of AI literacy. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 58, 638 - 655. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2456043
Li, S. (2025). Generative AI and Second Language Writing. Digital Studies in Language and Literature, 2, 122 - 152. https://doi.org/10.1515/dsll-2025-0007
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Anifa nifa, Hastri Firharmawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work
