PjBL-STEM Model in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Effectiveness, Differentiation, and Affective

Authors

  • Yusak Bien Institut Pendidikan Soe, Indonesia
  • I Nengah Suparta Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Putu Suharta Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Putu Sudiarta Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v12i2.17881

Abstract

The changing landscape of 21st-century education demands that mathematics learning is no longer oriented towards procedural reproduction, but rather towards the development of higher-order thinking skills, contextual problem-solving, and students' affective engagement. The integration of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) based on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) is seen as a potential pedagogical strategy to address these challenges. Although various studies report the effectiveness of PjBL-STEM on mathematics learning outcomes, studies that comprehensively integrate learning effectiveness, learning differentiation, and students' affective dimensions are still limited. This study aims to systematically examine the application of the STEM-based PjBL model in mathematics education with a focus on learning effectiveness, differentiation practices, and students' affective dimensions. This study uses a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach with reference to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were collected from Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and ERIC databases, with a publication range of 2015–2025. Twelve articles that met the criteria were analyzed using thematic content analysis and narrative synthesis. The review results show that STEM-based PjBL consistently has a positive impact on mathematical cognitive outcomes, problem-solving abilities, and 21st-century skills. However, learning differentiation strategies are generally not explicitly designed, and affective variables are often required as additional variables. These findings emphasize the need to develop integrative and inclusive PjBL-STEM designs that systematically consider diverse student characteristics.

Keywords:

PjBL-STEM, mathematics education, learning effectiveness, differentiation, affective dimension

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chang, C., & Chen, Y. (2022). Educational values and challenges of i-STEM project-based learning : A mixed-methods study with data-transformation design. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976724

Coufal, P. (2022). Project-Based STEM Learning Using Educational Robotics as the Development of Student Problem-Solving Competence. Mathematics, 10(4618), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/math10234618

Cruz, S., Viseu, F., & Lencastre, J. A. (2022). Project-Based Learning Methodology as a Promoter of Learning Math Concepts : A Scoping Review. Frontiers in Education, 7(July), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.953390

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12 : perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

Hakim, L. L., Sulatri, Y. L., Mudrikah, A., & Ahmatika, D. (2019). STEM Project-Based Learning Models in Learning Mathematics to Develop 21st Century Skills. ICSTI, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-10-2018.2281357

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). DIFFERENTLY : THE IMPACT OF STUDENT FACTORS. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 5(13), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0

Han, S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). How science , technology , engineering , and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the U . S . Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045

Hannula, M. S., Leder, G. C., Morselli, F., Vollstedt, M., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Affect and Mathematics Education: Fresh Perspectives on Motivation, Engagement, and Identity. Department of Mathematics and Information Technology.

Kuang, S., Ya, C., Carolyn, T., Chiupin, Y., & Sunny, L. (2022). Dispositions of 21st ‑ Century Skills in STEM Programs and Their Changes over Time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10288-0

Kwon, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity. STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025014

Lee, Y. (2022). Supporting Equitable Participation Through Project-Based STEM Learning at the Elementary Level. Southeast Asian Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–12.

Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Bicer, A. (2019). Affective Mathematics Engagement: a Comparison of STEM PBL Versus Non-STEM PBL Instruction. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 19(3), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00050-0

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education : a systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6

Manuel, J., Mantecon, D., Prodromou, T., Lavicza, Z., & Blanco, T. F. (2021). An attempt to evaluate STEAM project ‑ based instruction from a school mathematics perspective. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(5), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01303-9

Nguyen, H. T., My, Thi, G., Nguyen, C., Thi, L., & Thai, H. (2024). Teaching Mathematics Through Project-Based Learning in K-12 Schools : A Systematic Review of Current Practices , Barriers , and Future Developments. TEM Journal, 13(3), 2054–2064. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM133

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Portillo-blanco, A., Deprez, H., Cock, M. De, Guisasola, J., & Zuza, K. (2024). education sciences A Systematic Literature Review of Integrated STEM Education : Uncovering Consensus and Diversity in Principles and Characteristics. Education Sciences, 14(1028), 8–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci14091028

Prabaningrum, D., & Waluya, S. B. (2019). The Improvement of Mathematical Communication Skill Through Project Based Learning With STEM Strategy. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: ISET, 443, 646–651. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.132

Sarwi, S., Baihaqi, M. A., & Ellianawati, E. (2021). Implementation of Project Based Learning Based on STEM Approach to Improve Students’ Problems Solving Abilities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052049

Simamora, A. M. (2024). A Decade of Science Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PjBL): A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Computers for Science and Mathematics Learning, 1(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.70232/pn3nek61

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). The Rationale for Differentiating Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. DIFFERENTIATE INSTRUCTION : In Academically Diverse Classooms, 12–18. http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/HowtoDifferentiateInstructioninAcademicallyDiverseClassrooms-3rdEd.pdf

Tuong, H. A., Nam, P. S., Hau, N. H., Tien, V. T. B., Lavicza, Z., & Hougton, T. (2023). Utilising STEM-Based Practices to Enhance Mathematics Teaching in Vietnam: Developing Students’ Real-World Problem Solving and 21ST Century Skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1790

Vistara, M. F., Rochmad, & Wijayanti, K. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: STEM Approach through Engineering Design Process with Project Based Learning Model to Improve Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills. Mathematics Education Journals, 6(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/sy10763-014-9526-0

Wan, Z. H., So, W. M. W., & Zhan, Y. (2022). Developing and Validating a Scale of STEM Project-Based Learning Experience. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09965-3

Wangguway, Y., Kurniawati, S., Maylisa, I. ., Al Jabbar, Z. ., & Sulistiyono, B. (2020). The analysis of STEM-PjBL implementation and its effect on students ’ metacognition skills in resolving social arithmetic problems. Jurnal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(012048), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012048

Wilson, K. (2020). Exploring the Challenges and Enablers of Implementing a STEM Project-Based Learning Programme in a Diverse Junior Secondary Context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8

Downloads

Abstract Views : 6
Downloads Count: 23

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Bien, Y., Suparta, I. N., Suharta, I. G. P., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2026). PjBL-STEM Model in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review on Effectiveness, Differentiation, and Affective. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 12(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v12i2.17881

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.