Efikasi herbisida butil sihalofop terhadap gulma dominan serta implikasinya terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil padi sawah

Authors

  • Fadhli Hermawan UNMA, Indonesia
  • Dedi Widayat UNMA, Indonesia
  • Miftah Dieni Sukmasari UNMA, Indonesia
  • Umar Dani UNMA, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31949/agrivet.v14i1.19103

Abstract

Weed management is a critical factor in improving rice productivity because weeds compete with rice plants for light, water, nutrients, and growing space. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Butyl Cyhalofop 400 g L⁻¹ herbicide on rice growth, phytotoxicity, and yield performance. The experiment was arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design consisting of six treatments: Butyl Cyhalofop 400 g L⁻¹ applied at rates of 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.50 L ha⁻¹, an untreated control, and manual weeding. Observed variables included rice phytotoxicity, plant height, tiller number, productive tillers, harvested dry grain yield (HDG), and milled dry grain yield (MDG). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at the 5% significance level. The results showed that the application of Butyl Cyhalofop 400 g L⁻¹ caused no phytotoxic effects on rice plants up to three weeks after application. The herbicide had no significant effect on the number of tillers but significantly affected plant height, productive tillers, HDG, and MDG. The application rate of 1.50 L ha⁻¹ produced the highest number of productive tillers (17.50 tillers hill⁻¹), as well as the highest HDG and MDG values of 2.42 and 1.80 kg plot⁻¹, respectively. These results were comparable to those obtained under manual weeding for several measured parameters. Overall, Butyl Cyhalofop 400 g L⁻¹ maintained normal rice growth and improved yield components compared with the untreated control. Therefore, Butyl Cyhalofop 400 g L⁻¹, particularly at the rate of 1.50 L ha⁻¹, can be considered an effective and selective herbicide for weed management in rice cultivation.

Keywords:

Butyl Cyhalofop, herbicide, weed management, phytotoxicity, yield components, rice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chauhan, B. S. (2020). Rice weed management. Academic Press.

Chauhan, B. S., & Johnson, D. E. (2011). Growth response of direct-seeded rice to oxadiazon and bispyribac-sodium in aerobic and saturated soils. Weed Technology, 25(3), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00105.1

Dayan, F. E., Duke, S. O., & Grossmann, K. (2024). Herbicide mechanisms of action and resistance: Current status and future prospects. Pest Management Science, 80(2), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7900

Délye, C. (2005). Weed resistance to acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors: An update. Weed Science, 53(5), 728–746. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-121R.1

Délye, C., Michel, S., & Pernin, F. (2020). Molecular mechanisms of resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides. Plants, 9(11), 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111402

Duke, S. O. (2024). Herbicide selectivity and crop tolerance: Physiological and biochemical perspectives. Agronomy, 14(3), 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030611

Heap, I. (2025). International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds: Global status and trends. Weed Science, 73(1), 1–15.

Islam, M. S., Rahman, M. M., & Karim, M. A. (2024). Weed management effects on rice productivity in tropical agroecosystems. Agriculture, 14(4), 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040512

Korres, N. E., & Norsworthy, J. K. (2023). Crop–weed competition and resource-use efficiency in modern agricultural systems. Frontiers in Agronomy, 5, 1187456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1187456

Kumar, V., Jha, P., Jugulam, M., & Yadav, R. (2023). Advances in weed management in rice-based cropping systems. Agronomy, 13(8), 2145. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082145

Mahajan, G., & Chauhan, B. S. (2013). The role of cultivars in managing weeds in dry-seeded rice production systems. Crop Protection, 49, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.015

Mahajan, G., & Chauhan, B. S. (2021). Weed management in rice-based production systems: Recent advances and future prospects. Crop Protection, 148, 105726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105726

Norsworthy, J. K., Ward, S. M., Shaw, D. R., Llewellyn, R. S., Nichols, R. L., Webster, T. M., Bradley, K. W., Frisvold, G., Powles, S. B., Burgos, N. R., Witt, W. W., & Barrett, M. (2012). Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: Best management practices and recommendations. Weed Science, 60(Special Issue), 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00155.1

Rao, A. N., Wani, S. P., Ramesha, M. S., & Ladha, J. K. (2021). Weed management in rice production systems: Emerging challenges and opportunities. Advances in Agronomy, 168, 151–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.03.002

Singh, V., Kumar, V., & Chauhan, B. S. (2024). Recent advances in weed management for sustainable rice production. Plants, 13(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13020287

Swanton, C. J., Nkoa, R., & Blackshaw, R. E. (2015). Experimental methods for crop–weed competition studies. Weed Science, 63(SP1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00062.1

Takano, H. K., Beffa, R., Preston, C., Westra, P., & Dayan, F. E. (2021). Reactive oxygen species trigger the fast action of herbicides. Pest Management Science, 77(5), 2437–2448. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6287

Zimdahl, R. L. (2022). Fundamentals of weed science (6th ed.). Academic Press.

Downloads

Abstract Views : 11
Downloads Count: 4

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Fadhli Hermawan, Dedi Widayat, Miftah Dieni Sukmasari, & Umar Dani. (2026). Efikasi herbisida butil sihalofop terhadap gulma dominan serta implikasinya terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil padi sawah. Agrivet : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Dan Peternakan (Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Veteriner), 14(1), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.31949/agrivet.v14i1.19103

Issue

Section

Articles